Textile Recycling: Turning Waste Into Wealth for a Sustainable Future

Every year the world discards an estimated 92 million tonnes of clothing and fabrics, enough to fill a garbage truck every second . Most of this textile waste is either incinerated or dumped in landfills, where synthetic fibres can take more than 200 years to decompose and release greenhouse gases and microplastics into our soils and oceans . Although well‑meaning take‑back schemes exist, only about 15 % of textiles are reused or recycled in the United States , and a mere 1 % of global textile waste is recycled into new garments . The remaining materials represent a huge environmental liability and an untapped economic opportunity.

In this comprehensive guide, we unpack what textile recycling is, why it matters for businesses and the planet, how the recycling process works, the challenges and innovations shaping the industry, and practical steps companies can take to join the circular economy. Drawing on expert insights and recent research, we answer frequently asked questions and explore real‑world case studies that demonstrate the potential of textile recycling to turn waste into wealth.

What is textile recycling and why does it matter?

Textile recycling is the process of reprocessing pre‑consumer and post‑consumer textile waste into new materials or products . Pre‑consumer waste includes scraps and rejects produced during manufacturing, while post‑consumer waste comprises clothing and other textiles discarded by consumers or retailers . Because fabrics contain valuable fibres, dyes and chemicals that require significant energy and water to produce , reusing them reduces the demand for virgin materials and conserves natural resources.

Modern waste data paints a stark picture. Textiles are now the sixth most common material in household waste , with the typical consumer in the US and UK throwing away 66–70 pounds of textiles annually . Globally, only 20 % of discarded textiles are collected for reuse or recycling, and just 1 % becomes new garments . The gap between waste generated and recycled materials means that approximately US$150 billion worth of raw material value is lost each year . Closing this loop is not only essential for climate goals—it represents a massive untapped market for businesses.

The scale of textile waste is staggering:

• 120 million metric tonnes of textile waste are generated annually, according to a Boston Consulting Group (BCG) analysis .

• 92 million tonnes of this waste are discarded clothing and fabrics , a figure corroborated by UNEP and Earth911 . Production of textiles doubled from 2000 to 2015, while the average lifespan of garments decreased by 36 % .

• In the United States, textiles make up 5.8 % of municipal solid waste, but only 14.7 % of fabric waste is recycled .

• The fashion industry produces 53 million tons of fibre annually, yet less than 1 % is recycled back into new clothes .

• The European Commission estimates that raising textile‑to‑textile recycling rates to 10 % by 2035 could save 440,000 tonnes of CO₂ and 8.8 billion m³ of water per year .

• Only 8 % of textile fibres sold in 2023 were made from recycled sources , underscoring the need for scaling up recycling technologies.

These numbers illustrate a vast mismatch between production and responsible disposal. The consequences extend beyond landfill space—textile waste contributes significantly to the 20 % of global wastewater and 10 % of carbon emissions attributed to the fashion industry . Synthetic fibres break down into microplastics, releasing up to 500,000 tonnes of microfibres into oceans each year . Meanwhile, natural fibres like cotton consume enormous amounts of water and land . Reducing textile waste thus addresses climate change, water scarcity, pollution and biodiversity loss.

Current textile waste statistics

Textile recycling can be broadly divided into mechanical recycling and chemical recycling :

1. Mechanical recycling:

   • Process – Textiles are sorted by material and colour, then shredded into fibres, carded, and spun into yarns .

   • Pros – Suitable for natural fibres; widely used and relatively cheap.

   • Cons – The fibres shorten during shredding, reducing quality. Recycling often results in down‑cycled products such as insulation or cleaning rags . Blended fabrics are difficult to process because different fibres require different treatments .

2. Chemical recycling:

   • Process – Fabrics are broken down at a molecular level using chemicals to separate polymers or fibres, which are then reassembled into new, high‑quality yarns .

   • Pros – Produces fibres comparable to virgin materials and can handle synthetic fabrics.

   • Cons – Currently expensive, energy‑intensive and not widely available, though innovations are emerging .

Both methods require sorting to remove contaminants like zippers, buttons and mixed fabrics. Advances in AI‑powered sorting systems are improving throughput and accuracy , while innovations in fibre‑to‑fibre recycling aim to produce high‑quality yarns that can be recycled repeatedly .

How does textile recycling work?

Textile recycling offers environmental, economic and social benefits:

• Environmental – Reduces landfill use, conserves water and energy, and cuts pollution. Producing new textiles often requires water‑intensive crops like cotton and petroleum‑based synthetics; recycling reduces dependence on virgin resources . Increased recycling in the EU could yield carbon savings of 440,000 tonnes per year and reduce water scarcity by 8.8 billion m³ . Recycling also cuts microplastics and greenhouse gas emissions .

• Economic – Keeps valuable fibres in circulation and reduces raw‑material costs for manufacturers . BCG estimates that capturing greater textile value could generate US$50 billion in raw materials and create 180,000 jobs .

• Social – Provides affordable clothing and household goods to people in need and creates jobs in collection, sorting and recycling.

For businesses, textile recycling can also improve ESG (environmental, social and governance) scores and meet regulatory requirements, such as extended producer responsibility (EPR) laws. California’s Responsible Textile Recovery Act (SB 707) will require clothing producers to establish take‑back programmes by 2026 . The EU is implementing similar separate collection streams for textiles from 2025 .

Benefits of textile recycling

Challenges and misconceptions

Despite its promise, textile recycling faces numerous hurdles:

• Lack of infrastructure and investment – Most collection channels are designed for resale, not recycling; manual sorting dominates . Recycling facilities capable of fibre‑to‑fibre processes are scarce and require significant capital .

• Complex fabrics and blends – Modern garments often blend cotton, polyester, elastane and other materials. Mechanical recycling struggles with blends, while chemical recycling is still nascent .

• Down‑cycling vs closed‑loop recycling – Mechanical recycling often leads to open‑loop recycling, producing lower‑quality products that are not recyclable again . The dream of turning a cotton sweater back into another cotton sweater is currently achieved only with chemical processes, which remain limited .

• Greenwashing – Some corporate programmes incentivise customers to bring in clothes in exchange for discounts, but the textiles may still be down‑cycled or exported to developing countries . It’s important to scrutinise claims and demand transparency.

• Consumer confusion – People often lack information on how to dispose of textiles properly. Sorting rules vary by region, and many mistakenly believe clothes can be recycled alongside paper and plastics .

Innovation is transforming textile recycling:

• Fibre‑to‑fibre recycling technologies – Companies like Evrnu and EVRNU produce recycled cotton fibres that can replace virgin cotton . BCG notes that scaling such technologies could push recycling rates above 30 % .

• AI‑enabled sorting – Near‑infrared spectroscopy, robotics and machine learning are modernising sorting lines, increasing throughput by up to 90 % .

• Bio‑based materials – Researchers are developing textiles from algae, mushrooms and agricultural waste, offering biodegradable alternatives .

• Smart digital fashion – Virtual garments worn in online spaces can reduce demand for physical samples and overproduction .

• Closed‑loop manufacturing and circular design – Brands are designing garments with recycling in mind, using mono‑materials or detachable components to facilitate recovery .

• Policy momentum – Governments are implementing EPR schemes and setting recycling targets. The EU strategy aims for all textiles on the market to be durable, repairable and recyclable by 2030 , while the EU wants to recycle 65 % of textile waste by 2025 .

• Corporate commitments – Brands like Gap and H&M are partnering with recyclers such as Syre to secure recycled polyester . Adidas pledges to use 100 % recycled materials by 2024 . These commitments create demand for recycled fibres and encourage investment.

• Community and consumer initiatives – Clothing swaps, repair cafes and vintage markets extend garment lifespans. Many cities are piloting separate textile collection streams and offering incentives for donations. Consumers influence change by buying fewer, higher‑quality garments and supporting companies with transparent recycling programmes .

Future trends and innovations

• Netherlands extended producer responsibility (EPR) – By 2030, companies must prepare 75 % of textiles introduced to the Dutch market for reuse or recycling, and at least 33 % of fibres must come from recycled materials . EPR schemes like this create strong incentives for brands to design for recycling and invest in collection and sorting infrastructure.

• SuperCircle logistics – SuperCircle separated organic and synthetic fabrics to recycle over 700,000 garments in 2023, turning synthetics into new fibres and shredding organics for insulation . By combining logistics with advanced sorting, the company demonstrates a scalable model for the industry.

• EVRNU’s NuCycl technology – EVRNU produces circular, recycled cotton fibres from garment waste and aims to make all textiles recyclable by 2030 . Partnerships with brands like Levi’s showcase how new fibres can be integrated into mainstream products.

• CheckSammy’s Drop programme – The sustainability service provider developed a one‑step textile recycling programme for businesses, placing Drop Bags on‑site and arranging pick‑ups to divert waste . The company’s “Teddy Bear Project” turned 20,000 pairs of jeans into teddy bears, conserving water and demonstrating the potential of upcycling .

• Gap and Syre partnership – Gap signed an agreement with Syre to use 10,000 tons per year of recycled polyester across its brands . Syre’s localised model integrates recycling into supply chains and plans to expand production facilities in multiple countries. This demonstrates large‑scale commercial adoption of textile‑to‑textile recycling.

Case studies and examples

What types of textiles can be recycled?

Most natural fibres (cotton, wool, linen) and many synthetic fibres (polyester, nylon) can be mechanically or chemically recycled. However, blended fabrics and heavily contaminated textiles are more challenging . Advances in sorting and recycling technologies are improving the ability to handle blends .

Is mechanical or chemical recycling better?

Mechanical recycling is currently more common and cost‑effective but often results in down‑cycled products with lower quality . Chemical recycling produces higher‑quality fibres and can handle synthetic materials, but it is more expensive and not yet widely available . The future of textile recycling likely involves a combination of both methods, supported by technological innovation and policy incentives.

How can businesses participate in textile recycling?

Businesses can implement take‑back programmes, partner with recycling services, design products for easy disassembly, and source materials made from recycled fibres. Participating in EPR schemes and lobbying for supportive policies will also accelerate industry change.

Does textile recycling really reduce environmental impact?

Yes. Studies show that increasing textile‑to‑textile recycling rates can significantly reduce carbon emissions and water use . However, the impact depends on the energy source of the recycling facility and the quality of the recycled fibre. Life‑cycle assessments indicate that combining increased recycling with decarbonised energy grids yields the greatest benefits.

Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

Textile waste is both a massive environmental problem and a valuable resource waiting to be recaptured. With only 8 % of fibres derived from recycled sources and 1 % of clothing recycled into new garments , there is enormous potential for change.

Businesses, policymakers and consumers must collaborate to build a circular textile economy. Governments can accelerate change by enacting extended producer responsibility laws and investing in recycling infrastructure. Brands should design products for disassembly, commit to using recycled materials, and partner with technology innovators. Consumers can reduce their impact by buying less, choosing quality over quantity, donating unwanted garments and supporting companies that prioritise recycling and transparency.

If we scale effective recycling technologies, modernise sorting systems and foster demand for recycled fibres, we can turn waste into wealth—reducing carbon emissions, conserving water and creating economic opportunities for communities. The fashion and textile industries stand at a crossroads; embracing textile recycling today will lead us toward a greener, more sustainable future.

Read more about our recycling solutions here.